Practical insights for compliance and ethics professionals and commentary on the intersection of compliance and culture.

Integrity of game play: Unethical leadership by coaches

This is the fifth in a series of five posts on the topic of integrity of game play. The first post in the series was about the negative impact of player misconduct on sportsmanship and game outcomes. The second post pondered whether tanking can ever be ethical and judged numerous examples of the practice in different sports to assess potential morality of these actions. The third post covered referee bias in different sports, analyzing its prevalence or presumptions of it and how this type of bias may relate to overall ethical decision-making and choice theory.  Last week’s post discussed examples of organizational cheating operations by teams.  Today’s post, the fifth and final in the series, will delve into examples of unethical leadership by coaches.

Coaches are some of the most popular, visible, and influential leaders in society. Their tone and conduct can have a ripple effect on the behavior by and achievements of the players and teams they influence. To the public, coaches often provide the institutional identity for the team, expressing their mission and values in the media as well as defining the terms on which the organization wishes to compete and be known. Within team organizations, coaches are the most important people managers, tasked with both developing individuals and demonstrating operational commitment to the team’s strategy for the game, season, and beyond.

READ MORE

Spring break on Compliance Culture, Part 1

Compliance Culture is going on a short spring break hiatus.  Check back on Monday, March 26, when regular content for this week will be available.  The routine daily posting schedule will also resume at that time.

Until then, enjoy browsing the tags and archives, or click SURPRISE ME! on the menu bar at top for a random post.

See you soon!

READ MORE

Tension between innovation and regulation

Cutting-edge technology and competent supervision are often depicted as being at odds. Silicon Valley regards state and federal regulatory approaches with professional skepticism, reflecting the widespread sentiment that supervision is oppressive and stifling to creativity and design.  As the rationale goes, the ideas of futurists, technologists, designers, and engineers cannot develop freely amid the restrictions of legal and compliance controls.  By the same token, oversight attempts are presumed to be inadequately prepared for the task of keeping up with fast-paced technological advancements.

READ MORE

Corporate cultural change: Concise and accessible procedures

This is the fourth in a series of five posts suggesting best practices for implementing corporate cultural change.  For an overview of all the tips on this subject, check out this preview postThe first post in the series was about tone at the top and conduct to support it. The second post discussed the role of consistent, visible enforcement in promoting organizational justice and fairness.  Last week’s post focused on the importance of putting concrete, values-based policies in place.  Today’s post will be about implementing procedures that are consistent with those policies.  Next week, on March 27, the fifth and last post in the series will suggest how compliance professionals can foster a culture where employees are effectively engaged in awareness and communication to combat risks and support controls.

Last week’s post focused on the importance of creating and implementing policies that sufficiently and authentically support systemic responsibility for reform and intention for improvement.  Just as the appropriate tone and conduct must be observed from the highest levels of the organization in order to support enforcement efforts in the event of misconduct and abuse, corresponding policies must follow in order for the cultural norms to thrive.

For the standards set by the policies to succeed, organizations must put in place procedures that dictate practices which are consistent with and supportive of them.

Creating and implementing concrete, values-based policies is critically important for organizations to demonstrate operational commitment to improvement.  In order to take material advantage of momentum for reform in the examples set at the top in both attitude and behavior, as well as to nurture the culture of compliance created to support organizational justice and fairness, the policies in place must formalize this all.

Corporate compliance professionals should seek to create and communicate procedures that include the following traits in order to support a culture of compliance and enable progress, encourage organizational integrity and moral engagement, and protecting the vulnerable while punishing and preventing wrongdoing.

In order to accomplish this lofty goal, keep in mind “The 5 C’s” of procedures to implement for corporate cultural change:

  • Credible – Any procedure intended to prevent abuse, punish wrongdoing, and protect individuals must be believable.  Individuals asked to follow procedures must find them credible and believe that if faithfully executed, the risks and dangers they are intended to prevent or mitigate will be successfully addressed.  Regular review and the opportunity for ad-hoc adjustments, and transparency about the frequency and seriousness with which both of these tasks can be undertaken, will promote the believability and reliability of procedures.
  • Concise – It’s imperative that procedures are understandable by all.  They should not be so academic or theoretical that individuals using them struggle to know what they require and direct.  Concise procedures are practical ones.
  • Convenient – Convenience has two aspects with procedures: first, the ease of physical delivery and retrieval, and second, the quality of actual user experience.  Don’t put the procedures deep in the labyrinth of an intranet site or high on a shelf in a binder no one will ever open, and be sensitive to employees who may work remotely or with alternative accommodations.  Taking care of people who may not see e-mails or receive announcements at head office also allows compliance officers to “put a face to the name” and get some important personal contact with these individuals so that they know who to contact with questions and may feel more comfortable doing so.  The procedures also cannot be so burdensome in their steps or include so much complicated background information that they can’t be followed by the average reasonable employee.
  • Considerate of the audience – Further to concise, clear language in, and practical delivery of, the procedures, organizations should consider the audience fully in all stages of procedure provision.  The procedures should never be written and provided just to tick a box.  It’s so important to keep in mind that these are not just regulatory compliance obligations or requirements on a spreadsheet that must be completed.  Procedures must be used and relied upon by individuals.  Those audience members are the most important stakeholders and participants in the procedures, and drafting and implementing the procedures must be done so with great intention toward being considerate of them as the top priority.
  • Constructive – In reliance of the foregoing posts, and above all other considerations, the efficacy of procedures is imperative to make them useful.  Therefore the procedures must be constructive and aimed toward encouraging and enabling the real processes and interactions that are necessary for reform.  The desired result is a positive, fair corporate culture where people can speak up and speak out as well as work together toward creating an organization which reflects their own values.

Check back next week, Monday March 26, for the final post in this series of five, which will suggest best practices for going beyond training, in order to create convincing and compelling employee education campaigns and communications.

READ MORE

This week on Compliance Culture

Be sure to visit Compliance Culture this week for posts on these topics.

  • Monday: Corporate cultural change: Procedures to design and implement
  • Tuesday: Innovation and regulation
  • Wednesday: Integrity of game play: Unethical leadership of coaches
  • Thursday: Compliance and ethics of online platforms: Instagram
  • Friday: Sheena Iyengar and choice theory for compliance officers

Don’t miss it!

READ MORE

Last week on Compliance Culture

Check out last week’s posts on Compliance Culture, in case you missed or want to revisit them.

Many thanks for reading!

READ MORE

Compliance in Arrested Development

Check out the below clips from the cult classic television show Arrested Development.  Given that much of the show is devoted to dealing with the fallout from the family’s business operating fraudulently for many years, it should be no real surprise that there are many themes of compliance and ethics that recur throughout the show.

READ MORE

Round-up on compliance issues with online platforms: Facebook

This is the second in a series of six posts on compliance issues with various online platforms.  Last week’s post was about YouTube.  Today’s post will be about Facebook.  Next week’s post will discuss Instagram.  The fourth post in the series, on March 29, will focus on Twitter.  The fifth post, on April 5, will be about Snapchat.  On April 12, the sixth and final post in the series will discuss Reddit.

The online social media site Facebook was created in 2004 and in the following years has become one of the most well-known online platforms. Facebook was originally created as a social networking service by and for Harvard University students and then expanded to the broader Ivy League and then general university community before opening up in 2006 to all users who meet the local minimum age requirement.  Since 2012, Facebook has been publicly-listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange.

Facebook’s rise to extreme popularity coincided with the disruptive innovations in Internet-enabled devices other than traditional computers, such as smartphones and tablets. Therefore as the site grew its user base it became an immersive and highly-engaging platform for people to share a wide variety of personal information, partake in social interactions, upload media such as photos or videos, and participate in community-based activities organized by profession, background, and interests.

READ MORE

Integrity of game play: Institutional cheating

This is the fourth in a series of five posts on the topic of integrity of game play. The first post in the series was about various types of player misconduct and its implications for sportsmanship and game outcomes. The second post discussed the moral character of different types of strategic tanking and looked at various examples of tanking from a variety of different sports. Last week’s post was about referee bias in diverse sports and how it relates to overall decision-making and judgment.  Today’s post looks at examples of organizational cheating operations by teams.  The fifth and final in the series, on March 21, will analyze examples of unethical leadership by coaches.

Institutional cheating by sports teams has sparked repeated scandals in the media and inspired outrage from observers who perceive sustained operations by teams to cheat or gain unfair advantage as an assault on the competitive objective of game play. These cheating campaigns can have a dramatic, and disastrous, impact on both reputation of teams and their future competitive possibilities or the sustainability of their prior achievements that may have been reached dishonestly.

READ MORE

Insights from management for compliance officers

This is the fourth and final in a series of four posts on insights for compliance officers from different fields of study.  The first post in this series covered lessons from psychology regarding, for example, self-interest and decision-making, from prominent figures such as Sheena Iyengar and Malcolm Gladwell.  The second post was about insights for compliance officers from self-development and coaching, including from people such as Wayne Dyer and Eckhart Tolle.  Last week’s post discussed behavioral economics, focusing on the work of people such as Dan Ariely and Richard Thaler.  Today’s post will suggest ways in which management theory can be applied to corporate compliance programs.

As a practice, compliance is greatly concerned with topics such as governance, controls, leadership, sustainability, business values, organizational integrity, risk controls, institutional decision-making, tone and conduct at the top, and corporate culture.  It shares these general disciplinary themes with management theory, which takes on the broad task of determining and guiding the strategic direction of an organization and steering its employees and resources in furtherance of these goals.  Given that the contributions of a robust compliance program to the regulatory, practical, and cultural aspects of this task are great, compliance officers stand to gain great insight from studying commentary from the field of management theory.

READ MORE