Site icon Compliance Culture

Round-up on compliance issues with GDPR implementation

GDPR – the General Data Protection Regulation – is intended to establish a stronger, unified system of protection of personal data for individuals and businesses within the European Union. GDPR was adopted directly by the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Commission on April 27, 2016. Following a two-year transition period, GDPR will become directly binding and enforceable as of May 25, 2018.

GDPR is an improvement upon the 1995 Data Protection Directive, intended to enhance control by individuals over their own personal data and accountability for organizations in how they collect, handle, and maintain it. The Data Protection Directive was implemented by individual law in each of the EU nations and therefore created a patchwork of standards and practices varying between the member states.   GDPR therefore is intended to simplify and integrate requirements in a more cohesive and competent supervisory model.

Amid MiFID II implementation in January (see this post for more information on this financial system regulatory overhaul), organizations doing business in the EU were staring down a second major application of enhanced regulation with the approach of GDPR implementation in May. While MiFID II reaches far into the securities markets and financial system, GDPR will impact a far broader range of companies and consumer interactions. This enhanced data protection system extends its scope to include foreign companies holding data of EU residents in addition to organizations or processors based in the EU. Notice requirements, consent standards, and basis for processing of data lawfully, and handling of breaches are all harmonized and developed for further individual protection.

Like all regulatory compliance initiatives, GDPR has provoked a mix of controversy and anxiety. Organizations are confronting major expenses in time, resources, and money to up their standards, often invoking huge administrative burdens. Hopefully, the benefit to consumer protection, information security, and privacy in this complex age of data saturation will more than pay off. Giving individuals control of their personal data aims to support privacy and truth in the digital age and to provide safety and defense structures which will both prevent breaches as well as inform and protect consumers in the event of data theft.

Exit mobile version